Spurious Forecasts?
Abstract
P. C. B. Phillips (1998) demonstrated that deterministic trends are a valid representation of an otherwise stochastic trending mechanism; he remained skeptic, however, about the predictive power of such representations. In this paper we prove that forecasts built upon spurious regression may perform (asymptotically) as well as those issued from a correctly specified regression. We derive the order in probability of several in-sample and out-of-sample predictability criteria (F-test, root mean square error, Theil’s U-statistics and R-squared) using forecasts based upon a least squares-estimated regression between independent variables generated by a variety of empirically relevant data-generating processes. It is demonstrated that, when the variables are mean stationary or trend stationary, the order in probability of these criteria is the same whether the regression is spurious or not. Simulation experiments confirm our asymptotic results.
Download
The version of record can be downloaded here, while the pre-print can be freely downloaded here
Recommended citation
Martínez-Rivera, B., Ventosa-Santaulària, D., and Vera-Valdés, J.E. (2012). “Spurious Forecasts?.” Journal of Forecasting. 31(3). https://doi.org/10.1002/for.1219
@article{VERAVALDES2011,
author = {Martínez-Rivera, B. and Ventosa-Santaulària, D. and Vera-Valdés, J.E.},
title = {Spurious Forecasts?},
journal = {Journal of Forecasting},
volume = {31},
number = {3},
pages = {245-259},
doi = {https://doi.org/10.1002/for.1219},
url = {https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/for.1219},
year = {2012}
}